'Should we care about attribution'?
March 18 2016
Picture: RA
The RA website has an interesting piece on whether we should care about who painted what, in light of the new Giorgione exhibition in which attribution is hotly debated. Arguing 'yes' is the eminently sound art historian and noted connoisseur, Prof. David Ekserdjian, while arguing no is contemporary artist Doug Fishbone (who should presumably have written anonymously).
You can read the cases for yourself here, and there's a poll at the end of the article in which you can vote. Pleasingly, it's running at 80% in favour of Prof. Ekserdjian's case at the moment. Which just goes to show that no matter how often we're told that 'attribution doesn't matter' in art history, it certainly matters to the public.
Categories
- Research
- Exhibitions
- Auctions
- Discoveries
- Conservation
- Heroes of art history
- 15th Century & Earlier
- 16th Century
- 17th Century
- Master of the Blue Jeans donated to Pinacoteca cantonale G. Züst
- Imminent Release: The Cultural Work of the Early Modern Dutch Portrait - Amalia van Solms and the Shape of the Self in European Art
- Aert de Gelder conserved by Kremer Collection
- Portraits of Sir Francis Bacon
- Pierre Rosenberg on Poussin
- More ...
- 18th Century
- 19th Century
- 20th Century
- Study the The Fleming-Wyfold Art Foundation Archive with the PMC
- Funded PhD to Study Burlington Archive
- Recent Release: Biltmore House - The Interiors and Collections of George W. Vanderbilt
- Norwegian Bank Foundation acquires $9.2m Beckmann
- National Gallery seeking £375m to Buy Modern Art & Create Endowment Fund
- More ...
- 21st Century


