Previous Posts: articles 2018
Versailles' pre-emption
September 29 2016
Picture: ATG
In France, museums can 'pre-empt' pictures they want to acquire. This means that if somethings appears at auction, the museum can immediately announce after the hammer has fallen that it will take ownership of the work. The sale price is paid by the institution. But of course, because it did not have to bid, the price is lower than it otherwise would be in an open market. Good for the French state, bad for the private owner.
The latest case of pre-emption, reports the Antiques Trade Gazette, is in Versailles, where the palace has acquired the above painting of its orangery by Hubert Robert.
Brexit art
September 29 2016
A giant thumb has been unveiled as the latest work to grace Trafalgar Square's 'Fourth Plinth'. It's called 'Really Good' and is by David Shrigley. Unveiling the work, the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, linked it to Brexit, and said (reports The Guardian):
“What this represents is so important,” said the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, revealing the latest artwork to occupy the renowned spot.
“Optimism. Positivity. The best of us. Particularly post-Brexit, the three most important words I say are ‘London is open’ and this shows Londoners, visitors to London, tourists, EU citizens, immigrants that London is open.”
The fact that we have to say 'London is open' these days is sad enough. But expect more art to be co-opted into the Brexit arguments over the next few years.
Sleeper alert! (ctd.)
September 29 2016
Picture: Sotheby's
Regular readers may remember a 'sleeper alert' from a US auction in 2015. A portrait of a Sultan, described as 'Circle of Veronese', made $390,000 against an estimate of $2,000-$4,000. A reader alerts me to the picture's return to auction at Sotheby's, where it is again called 'Circle of Veronese', and this time carries an estimate of £150,000-£200,000. It's a high stakes game, this sleeper business.
Watch!
September 28 2016
Picture: Tern Television
Here's what we call in telly land the 'TX Card' for Britain's Lost Masterpieces. Of course, all AHNers are required to watch, and to tell their friends to watch. And their pets. And so on.
The £1.4m doorstop
September 27 2016
Picture: BBC
A £1.4m marble bust which until recently was being used as a doorstop is to go on display at the Louvre. The bust is by the French sculptor Edme Bouchardon, and shows a Scottish MP, Sir John Gordon. It was made in 1728, and belongs to a Scottish local authority, Highland Council. They were bequeathed in the 1920s, but it became lost for decades, before being found on an industrial estate in 1998, propping open a door. Inevitably, the council tried to sell it. But hopefully its inclusion in a new Louvre exhibition dedicated to Bouchardon will help persuade them to keep this important piece of local heritage.
Update - Colin Harrison, Senior Curator of European Art at the Ashmolean museum, writes:
Good to read that the bust of Gordon of Invergordon will be included in the forthcoming Bouchardon exhibition. It was published in:
Malcolm Baker, Colin Harrison, Alastair Laing, 'Bouchardon's British Sitters: Sculptural Portraiture in Rome and the Classicising Bust around 1730', The Burlington Magazine, Vol. 142, No. 1173 (Dec., 2000), pp. 752-762,
which you can read on JSTOR, if you have it.
Unfortunately, we found no evidence as to who owns the bust. Certainly, the local authority cannot claim title until it produces proper proof - ' found in a municipal store' might very well mean that, as often happened, it was merely lent by the owner for safe-keeping, perhaps in the First World War or at some other point of crisis. That particular branch of the Gordon family died out in the eighteenth century, but they married into the Mackenzie Earls of Cromartie, whose descendants may well be the legitimate owners. In the absence of any documentation, the only sensible solution would be for the bust to be displayed in Inverness Museum, where it has been in storage for nearly twenty years.
Fascinating. Might any claimants now come forward?
'Britain's Lost Masterpieces' (ctd.)
September 27 2016
Britain's Lost Masterpieces: Swansea Clip 1 from Tern Web on Vimeo.
Video: Tern Television/BBC
Sorry for the repeated plugs, but here's another taster of what to expect in our first programme, which is shown tomorrow, Wednesday, at 9pm on BBC4.
Introducing 'Pricasso'
September 27 2016
Video: ITV/This Morning
Ever wanted to have your portrait painted by a penis? This fellow in pink, Tim Patch, is happy to oblige. He goes by the name of 'Pricasso' - geddit? Apparently you can get a video of him painting your picture too, and there's too pay grades, one for aroused, and one for not. Guess which is the most expensive.
Incidentally, the 18th Century British portraitist John Astley used to do this - so it's nothing new. How long till the PhD thesis on penis painters?
2016 Turner Prize
September 26 2016
Video: AFP
This year's Turner prize features the usual load of whatever, and a giant bum with no hole.
'Britain's Lost Masterpieces' (ctd.)
September 26 2016
BRITAINS LOST MASTERPIECES_OPENING from Tern Web on Vimeo.
Video: Tern Television/BBC
Here are the pre-titles for Britain's Lost Masterpieces.
'Britain's Lost Masterpieces' (ctd.)
September 26 2016
Picture: Swansea Museum
I'm delighted to be able to tell you about the first news story from Britain's Lost Masterpieces. It's about the discovery of a beautiful and rare study by Jacob Jordaens, Atalanta and Meleager. Above is a post-restoration photo. Below is what it looked like when we first saw it. I've never seen such disastrous overpaint before. Fortunately, it was easy to remove.
The finished picture is in the Prado Museum, and can be seen here.
I'll be writing a much fuller piece on the painting and what it means for Jordaens' oeuvre (quite a lot, it turns out). But in the meantime, here is a piece I've written for the Art UK site, which was how we first came across the painting.
There's been quite a lot of news coverage. Here's The Sunday Times. It's been interesting to see how the news gets repeated by other sources, who can then make the occasional mistake. One newspaper, for example, said that the discovery would be shown in a new episode of Fake or Fortune?. While Artnet news came up with something very curious about us proving the painting by dating the frame!
Update - alas, it looks like Swansea Museum is facing unprecedented budget cuts. Let's hope any renewed interest in their collections can help fend off the local authority axe wielders.
Brian Sewell sale
September 26 2016
Picture: The Times
Just a reminder that the Brian Sewell sale is tomorrow at Christie's. I am very sad to report that I haven't been able to view the sale, nor can I make it to the auction. I'd really have loved to see his collection together. I will have to lurk in the auction room online to see what I can pick up.
Auricular frames conference
September 26 2016
Picture: National Trust images
I've been asked to remind any framing fans that there'll be a conference at the Wallace Collection on auricular frames (often great works of art int heir own right) next month. Details here.
Publishing art history digitally
September 26 2016
Picture: NYU
There's an interesting conference coming up in New York in October about publishing art history digitally. It's at New York University - details here. The pitch says:
This event brings together art historians and publishing experts to share their views on the future of publishing digital art history. Combining a lecture and two roundtables, this symposium will be of interest to all those involved in, or wishing to embark on, digital publishing, as well as to those who are looking for solutions to publishing digital humanities research in compact online formats.
Organized by Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide, the event is funded by the Samuel H. Kress Foundation and the NYU Center for the Humanities and is free of charge. It will be followed up by a hands-on professional development workshop at the College Art Association annual meeting in February, open to all CAA registrants at no extra cost.
Art history is, by and large, certainly behind the times when it comes to digital publication. But for me, the real change we need to make is not in the technology we use, but the attitudes we take. The printed page has primacy over everything, and there's a sense that really serious art history shouldn't be published online. If it is published online, then it's as an adjunct to a physical publication, like the Burlington Magazine with its £15-a-go PDFs: yesterday's technology at (what should be) yesterday's prices.
In other words, digital comes second. The publication of art historical research is still done primarily in a way that hasn't changed for centuries. You write it out, send it to a publisher, and then they print it on paper, often with small and bad illustrations, and ship it out to institutions and shops in the hope that some people will buy it or read it. All of which is great - I love a nice book as much as anyone - but it's not necessarily the best way to get people engaged in the work art historians do.
For me, it comes down to why art historians do what they do. Do they research new facts and make new discoveries for their own pleasure? Or do they do it because they want to be able to share their research with others, to communicate their passions, and inform wider audiences? If it's the latter, then surely digital publishing is the way forward. Not digital in the sense that an online version might be made available of a hard copy, in either a PDF or a clunky flipbook. But real, shareable, interactive, connected digital publishing. Art historians deal in images, primarily, so why don't we publish our research in such a way that allows us to easily click from one image to another, in glorious high-resolution, or x-ray or infra-red?
If we assume that only a small audience of already academically minded readers want to read our research, which is how most art historical publications currently operate, then we shouldn't be surprised if fewer and fewer people are interested in what we do. We must let other people into the conversation - and the digital door is the easiest one to open.
Update - readers have helpfully sent in some pioneering examples of digital art history. Here's the new Philip de László catalogue raisonné website, which is excellent. Catalogues raisonné are of course perfectly suited to online publishing, which gives the great benefit of being easy to update. The new site also has a section of missing pictures - have a rummage in case you have any clues. Yale's new Richard Wilson website is similarly excellent, and likewise that on Francis Towne.*
A reader also alerts me to VISTAS; Virtual Images of Sculpture in Time and Space. Which:
[...] combines old and new. We marry the most innovative technology to the highest standard of traditional book publishing — all in support of sound, new scholarship. We produce dual publications, one part in print, the other online at www.vistasvisuals.org. Each will supplement the other, not copy it.
I'm in awe of this site - do have an explore yourselves. The image quality is extraordinary.
Of course, there's also Google's art project, which has good images, but is lacking (so far) on the text and analysis side. They've recently revamped the site, which, sadly, has made it more difficult to navigate than it used to be.
*Sod's law; at just the time I want to mention them, the servers for both Yale sites seems to be down. Of course, the issue of what lasts over time is a different one. Books will always be with us - but websites?
'Moving Pictures'
September 23 2016
Video: BBC
Radio programmes about art, as paradoxical as it sounds, can often be really stimulating. Of course, nowadays digital media means radio programmes have evolved somewhat. 'Moving Pictures' is a fantastic new series on BBC Radio 4, which looks at one painting in detail, and combines the commentary with high-resolution digital photographs. In the clip above, Cathy Fitzgerald looks at Breughel the Elder's 'The Harvesters'. More here.
I hope programmes like this can encourage more close-looking in arts programmes. Too often, we're only allowed to see art on the telly through wide shots, with someone waving their arms in front of a painting. We've tried to avoid this, of course, in Britain's Lost Masterpieces.
#ArtforHillary
September 23 2016
Picture: Jeff Koons
Artists are lending their support to Hillary Clinton by selling works under the hashtag #ArtforHillary. Marvellous. But probably Jeff Koons' effort, Gazing Ball (da Vinci Mona Lisa), above, is the sort of thing Donald Trump would have on his wall.
More on Koons' Gazing Ball series in this guffy video here.
Update - perhaps I'm being too harsh. It seems Trump doesn't like any art at all, according to this piece in ArtNews by M. H. Miller. The article is well worth a click, but here are a few gems:
Commenting on a work by Chris Ofili, he said:
“It’s not art. It’s absolutely gross, degenerate stuff.” Note the word “degenerate.” There was, of course, another politician who used that adjective to describe works of art that offended him.
Not surprising from the man who allegedly kept a book of Hitler's speeches by his bed.
And Trump was once taken to Moma to look at a Warhol:
Trump arrives in a foul mood, and tosses his overcoat and some binders onto a Donald Judd floor piece, apparently mistaking it for a conference table.
Update II - by the way, AHN predicts a Trump victory in November.
An audience with Henry Wyndham
September 22 2016
Picture: China Exchange
This looks like fun - an interview with Henry Wyndham, the great auctioneer much admired (as regular readers will know) by AHN. It's on Monday 3rd October, Gerrard St, London, 6.30pm. Tickets here.
'How the Mona Lisa became so overrated'
September 22 2016
Video: Vox Almanac
A video by Phil Edwards from Vox says the Mona Lisa only became a masterpiece in the late 19th Century. Well, it's a view.
Wildenstein trial begins
September 22 2016
The art dealer Guy Wildenstein is being tried for over the non-payment of death duties relating to the estate of his late father, Daniel. The trial is expected to last a month. More here.
UK blocks export of £4.4m Titian drawing
September 22 2016
Picture: ACE
A rare drawing by Titian has had a temporary export bar placed on it by the UK government, in the hope that a museum can raise £4.4m to acquire it. More here.
Naughtiness at the V&A
September 22 2016
Picture: V&A
In The Spectator, Laura Freeman discovers the best places in the V&A for an illicit rendezvous. The trick is to go for somewhere subtle:
Thomas Hardy, while still married to his first wife Emma, but arranging assignations in London with Florence, his second-wife-to-be, used to ask her to meet him at the Victoria and Albert Museum by the great, towering plaster cast of Trajan’s column. Really, Thomas? Trajan’s column? How obvious can a man be?
